Prediction of Patrik Hartmeier vs Jip Van Assendelft Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Hartmeier vs J. Van Assendelft

Patrik Hartmeier
SUI
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
23
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Jip Van Assendelft
NED
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
23
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hartmeier 1 - 0 Assendelft
They have played 2 sets in total, with Patrik Hartmeier winning 2 and Jip Van Assendelft winning 0. The last match between Patrik Hartmeier and Jip Van Assendelft was at the M25 Trimbach, 08-03-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: Carpet, with Patrik Hartmeier getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hartmeier | 1 |
| Assendelft | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Trimbach(03-08-21)
Patrik Hartmeier
7
7
Jip Van Assendelft
5
5
P. Hartmeier vs J. V. Assendelft H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 42.57% (43-58) | Career Total W/L | 50.79% (32-31) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Hartmeier vs J. V. Assendelft Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patrik Hartmeier has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jip Van Assendelft has won 48.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patrik Hartmeier, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jip Van Assendelft has won 49.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patrik Hartmeier has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jip Van Assendelft has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patrik Hartmeier has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jip Van Assendelft winning 66.67% (W/L 6/3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patrik Hartmeier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/9). Jip Van Assendelft has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 20/16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Patrik Hartmeier has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jip Van Assendelft has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patrik Hartmeier winning 1 times and Jip Van Assendelft being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Patrik Hartmeier winning 2 and Jip Van Assendelft winning 0.
- The last match between Patrik Hartmeier and Jip Van Assendelft was at the M25 Trimbach, 08-03-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: Carpet, with Patrik Hartmeier getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patrik Hartmeier has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jip Van Assendelft has played against players with an average rank of 205.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patrik Hartmeier has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jip Van Assendelft has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patrik Hartmeier has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jip Van Assendelft has converted 29.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Patrik Hartmeier vs Jip Van Assendelft Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Hartmeier vs J. V. Assendelft H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:49:0 | Average Match Time | 1:49:0 |
| 52% (45/86) | 1st Serve % | 63% (49/78) |
| 76% (34/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (35/49) |
| 44% (18/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (10/29) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 42% (33/78) | Return Points Win % | 40% (34/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hartmeier 0%, Assendelft 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hartmeier 0%, Assendelft 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Hartmeier 0%, Assendelft 55%.
P. Hartmeier Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-7(4) 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
J. V. Assendelft Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 0-6 11-9 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||

P. Hartmeier vs J. V. Assendelft Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.57% (43/58) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 44.14% (98/124) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.33% (76/75) |
| 48.06% (1029/1112) | Games Win/Loss | 50.36% (766/755) |
| 50.00% (12/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 44.19% (19/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (20/16) |
| 35.29% (12/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 99 | Aces Total | 50 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 147 | Total Double Faults | 131 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 302.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.87 |
| 58% (1294/2236) | 1st Serve % | 61% (991/1618) |
| 66% (851/1294) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (644/991) |
| 46% (436/942) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (297/627) |
| 39% (79/202) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (65/157) |
| 38% (823/2151) | Return Points Win % | 40% (642/1604) |
| 42.57% (43/58) | Futures W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 42% (42/100) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (32/63) |
| 38% (12/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 38% (8/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (13/25) |
| 87% (45/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (34/25) |
| 13% (45/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (34/9) |
| 7% (56/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (29/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction07:08 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction08:35 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
08:35
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal